miércoles, 13 de marzo de 2013

My opinion on PDVSA in the OIL&GAS Journal



Badly damaged PDVSA should be replaced, founding board member says
03/13/2013
1
Facebook
10
Twitter
0
LinkedIn
11
Share
Venezuela’s national oil company was so badly damaged during Hugo Chavez’s regime that it will need to be replaced, a founding board member of Petroleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) declared.
“PDVSA is very badly managed, very corrupt, and has deviated into a company that builds houses, manages livestock, and does other activities that have nothing to do with oil and gas,” said Gustavo Coronel, who was elected to Venezuela’s Congress in 1998 and served there until Chavez dissolved it when he came into office a year later.
“My opinion is that this company cannot be saved,” he continued during a Mar. 13 teleconference hosted by the US Energy Security Council. “I think it’s very deeply damaged. It’s not going to be politically easy because Venezuelans are very much in favor of state ownership and will fight tooth and nail to keep a national oil company.”
Only two multinational oil companies—Chevron Corp. and Repsol SA—have stayed in Venezuela since Chavez came into power, Coronel said. Any replacement for PDVSA would need to offer terms that would bring ExxonMobil Corp., BP PLC, and Total SA back to attract the investment necessary to meaningfully develop the Orinoco heavy oil deposits, he indicated.
“I think the Brazilian model would be good: an oil regulating agency that controls a mixture of concessions and production sharing contracts through a small, moderately sized Venezuelan national oil company—certainly not the monster we have now,” Coronel said.
Chavez’s handouts
He said Chavez based much of his popularity on handouts to the poor, but this has weakened as Venezuela’s oil income dropped. Production has declined about 600,000 b/d since Chavez became president for the first time in 1999, Coronel said. If the government had executed the plan PDVSA inherited from pre-Chavez management, it would have been producing 5 million b/d, he maintained.
“PDVSA has about 160 employees (NOTE GUSTAVO: 115,000 employees), is losing production, and is not investing properly,” Coronel said. “Its refineries are at about 60% of capacity, and its debt has grown from $2 billion in 1998 to $85 billion now. It also heavily depends on the Chinese for financial support, and the Chinese are becoming disenchanted because PDVSA isn’t able to meet its supply commitments.”
He said Chavez’s successor as president, Nicolas Maduro, “is totally divorced from how an oil company should operate,” adding, “He is totally committed to one that is socialist and favors economic friends. Chavez promised about 16 refineries across the planet, yet did not build one in Venezuela in the 14 years he was in power.”
Coronel said opposition leader Henrique Capriles, who is challenging Maduro in an election next month, almost certainly would abandon Chavez’s agenda and begin to institute changes at PDVSA. “He believes in a more commercial and professional approach. He would bring back the big private oil companies—the true professionals in the field that have left the country,” the former PDVSA board member said.
“If a democratic government comes to power, the problems will disappear very slowly,” Coronel said. “A new government with a different approach should bring international oil companies back and mop up development of this heavy oil as soon as possible, particularly with the shale oil and gas boom in the US, Mexico, and Argentina which is making Venezuela less and less relevant.”
Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

8 comentarios:

  1. es decir...........habra que recoger los escombros, botarlos y comenzar casi desde serapio........

    Gracias fidel, gracias raul, gracias jalabolas chavistas, nos jodieron el pais y mataron a la gallina de los huevos de oro. Jodieron todo lo bueno.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. In a nutshell: Yes, we'll have to start from scratch. Far better to start from the ground up than to try to mend something so badly and sadly damaged.

    ResponderEliminar
  3. Y las empresas que venga a explotar se quedan con los pasivos laborales (los empleados actuales) que carajos se va a hacer con ellos? Ponerlos a hacer algo util requiere capacitación y tiempo.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Very well put Gustavo.  My congratulations to you for getting a hearing in a forum where informed opinion matters.  There are not a lot of people who understand how influential a publication Oil and Gas Journal is within the petroleum industry, but I do.

     

    ResponderEliminar
  5. Gracias, Jacob. Estas opinones están también recogidas en otros medios.
    Para el comentario #3, respondo. De los 115000 empleados actuales de PDVSA, muchos podrán trabajar en la Agencia Petrolera del Estado, en una "pequeña" PDVSA, sin tareas no medulares y en las empresas privadas que vengan al país . No tienen porque ser despedidos de la industria, al menos los buenos. Debe haber mucha ñángara reposeril en esos miles de empleados. Quienes manejen la cría de cochinos o la siembra de yuca en PDVSA pueden ser transferidos al Ministerio del sector, Agricultura y Cría. A la Junt Directiva le saldría transferencia a Tocuyito

    ResponderEliminar
  6. Gustavo, I have a quick question for you: Taking into account the normal expenses of running a company as large as PDVSA, how much money do you estimate PDVSA should turn over to the government while still remaining solvent?

    ResponderEliminar
  7. Jaime:
    The normal sequence for a company is to retain the money needed for capital investment, for maintenance an operating expenses, and then, give the rest of the money to the central government, NOT to the president. Th money required by the company changes from year to year, this is why they should have a budget and stick to it.
    An exampl: Shell, Exxon and Petrobras invest every year about $40 billion. PDVSA invests, or they say so, about $10 billion. Obviously insufficient.They spend money importing food or keeping Pastor Maldonado going around in circles but the refineries are badly maintained.
    In brief they should dedicate, depends on total income, about 40 percent of their income (a very gross estimate, as an example) to be re-invested in the company. And then, of course, they have to use the money well, not steal it.

    ResponderEliminar
  8. Your answer runs consonant with what I had anticipated and, percentage-wise, we both see about the same number and the need for intelligent spending. Even with those figures, the amount of money the government would receive is VERY substantial. I only wish I could actually see the results of that income. My fairly recent visit to Venezuela did not leave me with much hope for the future.

    ResponderEliminar