Aban Pearl sinking
An offshore drilling
barge, the Aban Pearl, owned by Aban Offshore Co. of India, was rented by the Venezuelan
state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela in mid-2008. However, the contract was
not signed with the owner but with a third party called PetroMarine Energy
services Ltd., incorporated in Singapore a few months before the contract was
signed. In turn, this company was owned by a company registered in Panama
called ISAPECO S.A., with a capital of $10,000, jointly owned by Mr. Enoc Martinez
and Mr. Hidalgo Socorro. The rental fee agreed by Petroleos
de Venezuela with PetroMarine Energy services was of approximately $730,000 per
day, according the Petroleos de Venezuela Annual report for 2008, see http://www.petroleumworldve.com/pdf/Memoria%20y%20Cuenta%20MENPET%202008.pdf), pages 1005 and 1006. However, the owners of the barge
only received $358,000 per day, according to a report to their shareholders,
see http://www.aban.com/downloads/aolpresentation.pdf. The
difference of about $372,000 per day obviously went into the pockets of the third
party.
Mr. Enoc Martinez is also the owner of
Astivenca, a contractor for Petroleos de Venezuela based in Maracaibo,
Venezuela. He traveled to Singapore for the signing of the rental contract of
the barge with Petroleos de Venezuela.
My conclusions:
·
The Aban Pearl was contracted
by Petroleos de Venezuela with a third party, not directly with the owner. This
is poor management and strongly suggests corruption
·
The third party,
PetroMarine Energy services, was incorporated in Singapore a short time before
the contract with Petroleos de Venezuela was signed. This is also a strong indication of corruption
·
A significant amount of
money, some $372,000 per day, went into the pockets of the third party
·
The owners of PetroMarine
Energy Services are contractors for Petroleos de Venezuela, in Venezuela, and
have close ties to the management of Petroleos de Venezuela
·
The Panamanian company
owner of PetroMarine had a capital at the time of only $10,000. It was a ghost
company, owned by the same person (s) that contracted for the barge with
Petroleos de Venezuela.
I have more details about this deal but these are the essential
ones.
Some charges of corruption are debatable and some are not. But this one is a slam dunk.
ResponderEliminarIt's not just corruption, but in your face corruption.