The FAO Caracas
representative is politicized: a formal complaint to FAO’s Headquarters
To: fao-hq@fao.org
Dear Sirs:
On
the basis of my best understanding of the guidelines given by your organization
to report misconduct within its ranks I am formally introducing a complaint to
the Office of the Inspector General of FAO against the behavior of FAO’s
Caracas representative, Mr. Marcelo Resende, which I consider grossly biased in
favor of the Venezuelan government in matters related to the critical
Venezuelan food situation and distribution. On the basis of this complaint I formally
ask FAO to conduct an investigation of its Caracas Office and the urgent
application of the corrections which might be pertinent.
Mr. M. Resende, FAO representative in Venezuela
1. These are the FAO
Guidelines:
Please report to the
Office of the Inspector General (Investigations) (OIG/INV) any instance of
suspected fraud and corruption including:
·
Unlawful acts related to FAO activities (for example
theft, fraud, embezzlement, solicitation/acceptance of bribes or kickbacks,
extortion);
·
Misrepresentation, forgery, or false certification in
connection with any official business;
·
Fraud committed to obtain undue financial benefits or
entitlements (e.g. fraudulent claims for rental subsidy, education grant,
travel, medical insurance);
·
Fraud, favoritism, disclosure of confidential bidding
information, or misconduct related to contract bids, performance of contract
obligations or evaluation;
·
Retaliation as defined under the Whistleblower Protection
Policy;
·
Complaints of workplace harassment pursuant to the Policy on the Prevention of
Harassment, Sexual Harassment and Abuse of Authority.
Offenses that
should not be reported
to this office include:
·
Complaints arising from working conditions or from an
administrative measure or decision.
2. On
the basis of these guidelines I claim that the Caracas Representative has
crossed the line, incurring in misrepresentation and favoritism, representing
the dismal Venezuelan government performance in food policies in a grossly favorable
light. This behavior demands an impartial and immediate investigation, in order
to preserve the reputation and credibility of the organization. I believe the
Office of the Inspector General is the one ideally suited to deal with this issue,
to judge by the description of its main activity, as leader of “the
Organization’s efforts to prevent and combat fraud… as the Office mandate
includes investigating alleged violations by personnel and the activities by
third parties”.
3. The essence of my
complaint is as follows. I am a Venezuelan/ Ú.S. citizen, now living in Virginia,
USA. I am not an expert in your field, just an observer of the current
Venezuelan reality in the food and agricultural sector. As you probably know
the availability of food and the situation of the agricultural sector in
Venezuela has become critical, to the point that the Venezuelan National
Assembly has declared a state of emergency to exist in these areas. Due to the
disastrous policies generated by the government that has been in place for the
last 17 years, Venezuela, in spite of the highest oil income in history, has
become a country where markets lack all essential foodstuff and where the
Venezuelan people have to stand in line for hours to obtain the most meager
food items, just barely enough for day to day subsistence. The country depends
heavily on food imports, largely controlled by government agencies. This has
generated significant corruption since tons of food, grossly over-billed, have
been imported already in rotten conditions and have been found abandoned and
hidden. These imports are mostly done through mafias made up of government
bureaucrats and its friends. The cases are numerous and I am sure you will be
able to find them in the Venezuelan and international press, see just one
example:http://www.maduradas.com/lo-que-vtv-no-cuenta-hallan-45-toneladas-de-comida-podrida-en-camiones-de-pdval-en-falcon/
In parallel with this tragic
situation your organization maintains, at least since 2013, a representative in
Venezuela, Mr. Marcelo Resende, who has become a prominent supporter of the
Venezuelan government policies related to food availability and distribution.
His laudatory comments have been abundant and defy the reality which is evident
to the eyes of anyone living in Venezuela today. Last year, in April 2015, he
publicly declared (my translation):
“Venezuela
is an example of good public policies to combat hunger, not only in our region
but in the whole world. FAO recognizes these efforts. He added:
“Venezuela is one of the countries
with the largest public food distributing network: Mercal, Mercalito, PDVAL,
Bicentenario and FAO can see this and congratulates the Venezuelan people. You
can always count with FAO’s support”. And went on to say
(abbreviated): “In name of the
United Nations I want to congratulate you. Here we have a vivid example of how
communes and government are winning food security and sovereignty”.
Coming at a time in which Venezuelan
suffer a tragic food crisis and when corruption in those governments
institutions mentioned by Mr. Resende are very well documented, these
expressions of support by FAO’s Caracas representative have been considered by
Venezuelans as extremely cynical. In fact, PDVAL and Bicentenario
bureaucrats have been found to be involved in massive corruption, see:http://www.eluniversal.com/nacional-y-politica/160130/presos-presidentes-de-abastos-bicentenario-y-cval-por-hechos-de-corrup
In those same days of 2015 the
Venezuelan government had transferred $12 million to the FAO’s Caracas office
to finance a program to “eradicate hunger”.
In the last few weeks, March 2016, Mr.
Resende has, again, made extremely laudatory comments about the Venezuelan food
disaster. He has said, see: http://www.noticierodigital.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20944 : My translation: “I congratulate the people and government of
Venezuela for the existence of the best public food distribution network and
for structuring an active social participation and organization [in this
sector].
I have to presume that Mr. Marcelo Resende
has been co-opted by the Venezuelan regime to become one of its most ardent
supporters. His pro-government bias is not only unjustified but cruel, in light
of the Venezuelan reality. As a Venezuelan born citizen I strongly protest
against this unprofessional posture by the FAO Caracas office representative.
I think this deserves an investigation by
FAO’s highest authorities since the name of the organization is being invoked
to support what is, in fact, a major tragedy.
4. I have sent the information listed above
to you, in letters dated March and May of this year and have received a polite
reply three days ago, to the effect that my complaint had been sent to the
“relevant” office in the organization, as it was outside the jurisdiction of
the Inspector General’s Office. This is the reason I am re-sending the
complaint in a more formal manner.
5. I am taking this step for my country of
birth, Venezuela, asking justice for its suffering citizens, but also in your
own behalf since I believe the credibility and the prestige of your
organization is at stake.
6. I
am at your service at my address:
Gustavo Coronel
8360 Greensboro Drive 710
McLean, Virginia 22102
Telephone 703-3567470
Gustavo,
Unfortunately, I think your only chance at prodding the Inspector General to act will be if Marselo Resende has failed to share some of the wealth being passed to him with others in the FAO.
It's a well-established system that works in all kinds of organizations operating under UN auspices. Everyone protects each other so that everyone gets a taste.
I still have some faith in the power of embarrassment. If this does not work we keep hammering at them
ResponderEliminarGustavo
Dales con todo, Gustavo. Esos carajos de la FAO lo que son es una cuerda de burocratas desconectados de la realidad. A Venezuela lo que le paso fue que dejaron que la logia castrocomunista jodiera las FFAA y esos lodos trajeron estos polvos. Pero se recuperara. A Venezuela hay que recuperarla pensando en Noruega.
ResponderEliminarEn el caso de Noruega, donde he estado varias veces, después de estudiar su caso – que en sendos trabajos he publicado en mi blog http://escritoseneltiempo.blogspot , puedo opinar que rige un sistema monárquico – la presencia del Rey ni se siente -, parlamentario – hay un Primer Ministro, que por nada en el mundo se encadena; rige el Estado de Derecho; se respeta la propiedad privada; hay una economía diversificada, ya que, aprovecharon el petróleo para alcanzarla; con economía de libre mercado pero no absoluta; con una envidiable seguridad social expresada en salud ( hospitales públicos que son cinco estrellas, con sentido humanitario en el ejercicio de la Medicina- los Médicos hacen de su Profesión un Apostolado; al igual que los para médicos; hay que presenciar y constatar lo que afirmo. Lo viví. La seguridad de bienes y de personas es de excelencia. Es un país primero en el mundo en desarrollo humano. El fondo de ahorro petrolero es inmensamente rico y no como el de aquí que nunca pasó de 3 millones de dólares. Es un país de honestidad acrisolada, se condena la corrupción. Es pacifista. Se respira la libertad Y la Constitución es sacrosanta: belleza ver, cada 17 de mayo Día de la Constitución, donde los niños son los primeros, con bandera en manos, en encabezar esa celebración. ). Chávez, que visitó a Noruega, a principios de su ¨desgobierno¨ha debido orientar su gestión siguiendo el modelo noruego; pero, lamentablemente, ya sabemos lo que ocurrió ante la entrada supermillonaria de ingresos petroleros a Cuba.
Estimado Sr. Coronel, por favor escuche Ud el programa Golpe a Golpe de hoy Mayo 25 '16.
ResponderEliminarEn el, entrevistan a la Sra. Susana Raffalli miembro de la Fundacion Bengoa acerca de la emergencia nutricional. Ella habla de como la FAO le de premios a Venezuela por sus programas de alimentacion.
Yo encontre en google el email de la Sra Raffalli en caso que Ud quiera comunicarse con ella es: susana.raffalli@gmail.com
Aqui esta el url de la grabacion: http://ow.ly/Tnl8300zHlq
La entrevista empieza a los 5 minutos.
Un abrazo
Adolfo G.
Una triste realidad, que ha imperado a través de la historia.
ResponderEliminar