Whoever reads the profile of Professor Steve Ellner (see above) cannot
fail to see that he is a dedicated supporter of the criminal regime that has
destroyed Venezuela during the last 15 years. Since I have no reason to accuse
him of being a mercenary I will assume he is just ideologically blind to the
evidence that is right before his eyes (he lives, at last partial time, in
Venezuela). His eyes are afflicted by ideological glaucoma and by his adoration
of the despotic Venezuelan regime. As you can see in his profile above, Ellner
has been a consistent admirer of the manner in which the diseased satrap and,
now, his imposed succesor, have run Venezuela into the ground, while allowing the Castro brothers to become
the real power behind the throne in Venezuela.
Now Ellner delivers, in a pro-Maduro website www.venezuelanalysis.com (also pro-bono?) a new pack of lies that I would like to
comment. I will show graphic material at the end of this article that proves how criminally wrong this man
is. Ellner teaches at the Venezuelan Universidad de Oriente and in Columbia
University. I say: Universities, be not proud about Steve. Academics is the
arena of truth and intellectual honesty.
This is what he says:
Unlike What the Media Says or Implies, the Violence in Venezuela Is Being
Perpetrated by the Opposition
By Steve
Ellner, February 20th 2014
The slant of the Venezuelan private media and the
international media on what is happening in Venezuela is clear: The government
is responsible for the violence. In the first place government-ordered gunmen
are shooting at pacific demonstrators and the violence generated by the
opposition is just a response to the brutality of police and military forces.
But there is considerable evidence that shows that the violence, including that
of unidentified motorcyclists against the demonstrators, is being carried out
by the opposition.
Gustavo
Coronel: Says who? Ellner? As Brian Nelson has documented in great detail in his book on the Venezuelan events of 2002 (reference below) ,
the events of 2002 that forced the military to ask for Chavez ‘s resignation
were triggered by Chavez ‘s criminal order to unleash the army against the
peaceful protesters. The Puente Llaguno massacre, never investigated by the
regime, was led by people later decorated by the government, such as the
assasin called Richard Peñalver, the one shooting in the photo.
Here is Peñalver, embraced by Chavez.
Another gangster, Rafael Cabrices, became the leader of one of
Chavez’s armed militias.
Says Ellner:
2.
On April 11, 2002, the day Chávez was overthrown, the
Venezuelan and international media and the White House used juxtaposition of
images of Chavistas shooting pistols in downtown Caracas, on the one hand, and
peaceful anti-government demonstrators, on the other to justify the coup.
However the Irish-produced documentary “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”
and other documentaries demonstrated by the flow of the camera that the
demonstrators were far away from the Chavistas and that they were shooting in
response to sniper fire against them.
Gustavo
Coronel: The documentary “The Revolution Will not be televised” has been found
to be full of intentional errors and manipulation, as shown by journalist Phil
Gunson, a writer for The Economist (see page 265 of Brian Nelson’s book; The
Silence and the Scorpion”) , who says that there were omissions of key facts,
invention of others, twistingof the
sequence of events and the use of archive images in replacement of actual
events. All of the murderers of Puente Llaguno were set free by a accomodating
justice system. The documentary telling the truth about the events, that of
Luis Fernandez and Julio Rodriguez, won
the King of Spain’s Award for journalism.
Says Ellner:
6. The term “salida,” which has become a main slogan of the protesters,
implies regime change.
Gustavo Coronel:
This much is true. This regime has to go. It is illegitimate, inept and
corrupt. Originally Maduro could not be candidate according the constitution. The
corrupt Supreme Tribunal of Justice allowed him to be. He did not win the
elections. But his illegitimacy derives essentially from his inept and corrupt
government. Even the poor are fed up with this disaster and this why the civic
rebellion in Venezuela includes the poor neighborhoods, see The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/20/venezuelas-poor-protests-chavez-revolution .
Says Ellner:
8. The government has nothing to gain by the violence
because the media is largely on the side of the opposition and present a
picture of the violence which directly and indirectly blames the government,
Gustavo Coronel: Ellner lies when he says most of the
media are in hands of the opposition. Precisely, what exists right now is a
total blackout of the news about the Venezuelan events. Maduro blocked twitter,
threatened CNN with expelling them from the country, has shut TV stations down,
does not allow opposition newspapers to
import paper. To say the opposite is dishonest.
Says Ellner:
9. The Venezuelan
government has shown great restraint in the context of opposition- promoted
violence and disruption.
Gustavo
Coronel: In stating this obvious lie Steve Ellner is accompanied by other fellow travelers
like Larry Birns, from COHA, who recently produced a piece along the same
lines, see http://lasarmasdecoronel.blogspot.com/2014/02/cohas-disgraceful-report-on-venezuela.html
.
The fellow
travelers of the Maduro-Castro regime are getting active in their disinterested (?) defense. Julia Buxton,
Mark Weisbrot and Miguel Tinker Salas are probably next in line.
Says Ellner:
10. Governments, particularly undemocratic ones,
which lack active popular support and completely control the media effectively
use repression against dissidents. This is not the case in Venezuela. None of
the non-state channels and newspapers (that the vast majority of Venezuelans
get their news from) supports the government and most of them are ardently
anti-government. As Smilde says, the use of violence by the government makes
absolutely no sense.
Gustavo
Coronel: Listen Ellner. This is, precisely the case in Venezuela. Or are you
blind and deaf? There are no opposition TV channels left in Venezuela! The Colombian
TV channel trying to cover events in Venezuela was expelled by the Cuban
puppet, Maduro. CNN was threatened by expulsion by the puppet. Globovision was
bought by the regime. RCTV was cancelled. VeneVision is owned by a pro-government
or, at least, a silent businessman. The press is being left without paper due
to the lack of paper. What are you talking about. Who are you trying to
deceive? What kind of member of academia are you?
I agree with
Smilde that the use of violence by the regime makes no sense. But, the problem
is that they
have no sense!!
You want to see
proof of the violence?
Ellner:
There are hundreds of photos and videos that will demolish your lack of intellectual
honesty. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Ellner:
ResponderEliminarNone of the non-state channels and newspapers (that the vast majority of Venezuelans get their news from) supports the government and most of them are ardently anti-government.
Which non-state channels are "ardently anti-government?" [Newspapers, perhaps.]
Inquiring minds want to know.
Para Ellner, Penn y Co.
ResponderEliminarQuien y como les retribuyen por esas manifestaciones a favor de la dictadura?
Por la plata baila el mono!
May I add another Fellow Traveler ... oops! ... "Liar" to the list?
ResponderEliminarMark Weisbrot, one of the writers Oliver Stone used for his 2009 documentary polemic South of the Border.
Weisbrot has just given the world another outrage to add to his impressive list of previous falsifications. He has trumpeted the Maduro lie that the protests are a Washington-sponsored coup attempt aimed at regime change in Venezuela.
Mark Weisbrot on U.S. Support for Regime Change in Venezuela
There is no need to address his mishandling of the facts, except to point out that his selection of "proof" for his line of argumentation relies almost exclusively upon "studies" published by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, which has supported the programs of leftist governments in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venzuela for years. But the weaknesses in his presentation--My God! Even CNN is against him!--will only lead all of us to watch as the inevitable march of history once again forces leftist intellectuals to confront the failures of the Socialist model.
No one can talk to these leftist commentators about the cost in human lives and misery they help to sustain. The Left has never cared about human misery before, they have always been set upon transforming the way people think. And right now Venezuelans are showing the world that they think a better life can be had if Socialism for the 21st Century is set aside. Yet Mark Weisbrot would have us believe that hundreds of thousands of people showed up in the streets of Caracas today because Washington ordered them out.
If there is any good news to be seen in the dissemination of recent information it is that some of the more respectable news organizations in the developed world are now reporting to counteract the indoctrination fostered upon us by dishonest propagandists like Mark Weisbrot and Steve Ellner.
The London Daily Telegraph has an excellent review of the situation which calls down leftist commentators for fostering the lie of Maduro's democratic election, a fact it presents along with other useful information explaining the failures of the regime:
Venezuela: the Left's Favorite 'socialist paradise' is sliding into poverty and dictatorship
Investor's Business Daily also offers a sound analysis of the Venezuelan protests, though it is quite pessimistic about their prospects for success so long as the resistance remains passive, comparing Venezuela to the Ukraine, where protesters are much more likely to achieve their goals.
Ukraine and Venezuela: This Ain't No Velvet Revolution
Sadly, the following quote strikes me as frighteningly realistic:
"...It's hard to win against regimes like [Maduro's] with constant surrender. Sadly, Venezuelans have been doing this for 15 years without result....Outside the country, few understand that Venezuela is in fact ruled by communist Cuba, which has sent 60,000 personnel to infiltrate every branch of the shambling government, and which literally issues orders to its president because it needs him in power and his oil cash to keep Cuba and its failed economy afloat...."
If current events in Venezuela continue apace, Fellow Travelers like Steve Ellner, Roy Chaderton, and Mark Weisbrot will soon find themselves sitting and shaking their heads as history once again passes them by. The lights are coming on again.